Humble Confidence

Washington and Lafayette had the humble confidence to become heroes.

Washington and Lafayette at Valley Forge. They both had the humility and confidence to become heroes. Painting: John Ward Dunsmore (PD), via Wikipedia.org.

In the history of this world, the most admired individuals have been the heroes. What sets them apart? How are they so special? Some of the characteristics are selflessness, sacrifice, and humble confidence. These are good things to emulate, but they’re not easy. Personally, I have too much ego. Oh, well.

When I first thought of the term, “humble confidence,” it seemed an oxymoron—a self-contradictory term. I had wanted an expression to describe a condition I had experienced and that is the first thing that popped into my mind. It took me a moment, but any discomfort I had for the term soon evaporated.

Defining Humble Confidence

Buddhist monk meditating with humble confidence.

Buddhist monk meditating with humble confidence. Phra Ajan Jerapunyo, Abbot of Watkungtaphao. Photo by Tevaprapas Makklay (CC BY 3.0), via Wikipedia.org.

“Humble,” per the American Heritage Dictionary means,

  1. Having or showing feelings of humility rather than of pride; aware of one’s shortcomings; modest; meek.
  2. Showing deferential respect.
  3. Lacking high station; lowly; unpretentious.

“Humility,” in the same dictionary means,

  1. The quality or condition of being humble; lack of pride; modesty.
  2. Usually plural. An act of modesty, submission, or self-abasement.

Don’t you just love the circular reference between definitions (each definition using the other word to define itself)?

Statue of Jesus Christ, symbol of humble confidence.

Statue of Jesus Christ, a divine hero and the epitome of humble confidence. Photo by Sean Vivek Crasto (PD), via Wikipedia.org.

I can see a hero being modest, perhaps meek (and perhaps not), and showing deferential respect to others. “Lacking high station,” doesn’t work for me. A king can be a hero if he doesn’t let his station go to his head. If he acts as if his kingship is a responsibility, and perhaps acts as if he is a lowly servant of his people, then a king could easily be a champion to his people. “Lack of pride” and “modesty” are compatible with my idea of a hero. So is “submission.” “Self-abasement” also works for me, except when it means “self-humiliation.”

In the dictionary’s comparison of several words (humble, meek, lowly, modest, reserved, retiring and self-conscious), it says that, “meek describes one who is patient, undemonstrative, and submissive or timid.” I can’t see a hero being overly timid, especially about taking responsibility for something that needs to be done.

Examples of Humble Confidence

Drawing from Tale of Two Cities, a story of confident humility

Engraving by Hablot K. Browne for Charles Dickens’ “Tale of Two Cities.” A story of heroism.

In Charles Dickens’ Tale of Two Cities, Sydney Carton takes the place of his look-alike, Darnay, under the guillotine. The story ends with Carton’s last thoughts, “It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to, than I have ever known.” Perhaps not many of us would do such a thing—perform such self-sacrifice for another. Carton’s actions provoke from the reader either bewilderment or deep admiration. His was an act of profound heroism.

Jesus of Nazareth told his disciples, “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends (John 15:13).” This is the ultimate self-sacrifice, and that is exactly what Jesus did when he knowingly walked into his own crucifixion.

I grew up in a Southern Baptist family, but somehow I had a hard time with Christianity. Some parts seemed pretty cool when I was a youngster. The “holier than thou” and “hell-fire and damnation,” didn’t go over too well with me. Sorry, granddad (he was a Southern Baptist minister and missionary to Nigeria, Africa). My father also seemed to chafe under orthodox Christianity. He might read the Bible one week, but then might read about the reincarnation of a yoga, the next. In fact, he seemed to read more Eastern mysticism and New Age literature than traditional, religious works. For me, despite an aversion to the Christian dogma, the miracles and the self-sacrifice were things that were immediately admirable.

Certainly, Jesus’ sacrifice seemed heroic to me. Going around calling himself the “son of God” did not seem too humble, though. Yet, I had much more to learn about this.

Clarifying the Humility

Rock Creek Park, site of a suicide (not exactly humble confidence).

Rock Creek Park near Washington, DC, where one former fellow student committed suicide (the opposite of humble confidence). Photo by dbking (CC BY 2.0), via Wikipedia.org.

Earlier I said that “self-abasement” doesn’t seem what a hero would do if this means, “self-humiliation.” Anyone who goes around in public beating themselves up seems more like a “loser” to me—someone not garnering much respect, because they’re not giving themselves any respect. To be sure, there are similarities in the look of humility and self-humiliation, but that’s only superficial. There’s a very big difference. It’s all in the attitude. Humility is about less ego—less of the self. Self-humiliation is all too frequently a self-indulgence. The most extreme example of this is suicide.

Suicide, in my opinion, is one of the most selfish acts one can do. In high school, my senior year English teacher seemed to admire those who committed suicide. He talked about the subject on numerous occasions. I attempted to disabuse him of this, but my efforts failed. I was particularly concerned about a fellow student—a lovely young woman named who always seemed to have running mascara and red eyes. Six years later, I read that the young woman jumped off a bridge in Rock Creek Park, near Washington, D.C. My heart aches even now at the thought of it. And there is also anger at my English teacher for having thought that suicide was so wonderful and trendy. Finally, there is anger at her for having given in to the demons.

If she had been feeling pain, sticking in there would obviously have been a heroic thing to do. Committing suicide in the face of such anguish is a coward’s act, and just as selfish as any cowardly thing. That may seem harsh or unsympathetic (sympathy is overrated, but empathy is golden). The ability to act with courage in the face of such distress is a sign of confidence. Any hero needs this in order to move past things like fear and discomfort.

A self-humiliating person who throws their self in harm’s way, and saves someone else, may be doing it for all the wrong reasons. The motivation may be one of suicide rather than self-sacrifice. Their confidence or lack thereof would play a major part in their decision.

The Other Half of Humble Confidence

“Confidence” is defined, “1. Trust in a person or thing. 4. A feeling of assurance or certainty, especially concerning oneself.” In the adjacent discussion of synonyms, the dictionary says, “self-confidence, self-possession, and self-reliance all imply consciousness of one’s own powers and abilities. Self-confidence stresses trust in one’s own self-sufficiency.” A hero needs at least a modest amount of competence. Incompetence is not very heroic, though a person who overcomes initial failure to win the day can also seem every bit the hero. With competence comes confidence and vice versa.

Someone with humble confidence may feel self-sufficient for some task, but is averse to bragging about it. All too often, I fail there. Bragging is second nature to me. Again, oh well! Perhaps the expectation of the hero is that everyone can do such things, just as Jesus said that anyone can do the miracles he did and even greater things. All one needed was the faith to do them.

Faith is Beyond Belief

The paramitas of Buddhism are all about humble confidence.

Monks line up at Phutthamonthon Buddha. Their “paramitas” are all about humble confidence. Photo: Tevaprapas Makklay (CC BY-SA 2.5), via Wikipedia.org.

“Faith” and “belief” have been used interchangeably, but I propose defining them as distinctly separate states of being—also, attitudes. “Belief,” as I see it, is a level of confidence with varying degrees of doubt. This could be anywhere from zero confidence right up to, but not including, perfect confidence. I reserve that slot—100% confidence—for my definition of “faith.” This new “faith” is discontinuous in nature. It is separate from the continuity of various grades of “belief.” This new “faith” is like the Buddhist “one hand clapping”—a one-sided coin—that contains no hint or possibility of doubt. The Buddhist paramitas (or “perfections”) also speak of this “discontinuous” state. Paramita generosity, wisdom and compassion are perfectly what they are with no hint of selfishness, stupidity or indifference, respectively. They are the godly ideal.

When one exercises confident humility, one suppresses or eliminates the continuity-based ego self. All that is left is the discontinuity-based true self—the immortal.

When Genesis says that God created man in his own image, this provokes many images—all of them indistinct. So, what does this mean?

When, a chapter later, Genesis says that God created man, again, what gives? This time, man is created from the dust of the ground.

The image of God is one that is spiritual in nature. God is a spiritual being with the power of creation. That makes his children spiritual beings with the power of creation. Okay, but what about this “dust of the ground” stuff? Would that be Homo sapiens? Would the sons of God be immortal, spiritual beings clothed in Homo sapiens flesh? Arguably, the dual nature of man is one of the most important subjects of the Bible. In fact, it is an important theme in most, if not all, religions.

It’s hard to talk about some of the experiences I’ve had without sounding a bit like the braggart. Well, tough! The message is too important.

When I experienced humble confidence, one of the most vivid things I noticed was a complete lack of the ego self. As I said, ego is continuity-based. It is a cog in the machine of physical reality, just like emotions, the clothes you wear, and the body you think of as “you.” They are all subject to the laws of physical reality. They are subject to vectors of force. They are vulnerable.

George Washington and men en route to Valley Forge. Symbol of humble confidence of heroes.

Washington and men on the way to Valley Forge. I’m no Washington, but I can understand his humble confidence. Painting: William Trego (PD), via Wikipedia.org.

My Own Personal Experience with Humble Confidence

In 1977, while living in Los Angeles, I experienced a major miracle. More accurately, I created one. You see, I had been creating minor miracles for four years. Most of those acts of primordial “magic” were done while largely asleep, spiritually. I had discovered the mechanics of creation and had used them on numerous occasions. Invariably, the results were instantaneous. Only I would know that, because only I would know the moment each creation had been allowed into physical reality (unless there happened to be any mind readers around).

So, what was this major miracle? Frustrated in rush-hour traffic, one smoggy, late afternoon, I realized that I had been creating my own frustration.

Heads up, everyone! Just a friendly reminder—you are fully responsible for what happens in your life. That’s a big one-zero-zero percent (100%)! Don’t quibble with it. Don’t justify or try to squirm out of it. There is no insanity plea or “twinkie” defense. And don’t “blame” it on karma. You create your own karma. Karma is there for a reason—to help you wake up, spiritually. But the source of that creation is you.

Upon realizing my own culpability in creating my frustration (and creating the things toward which my frustration was directed), my “hurry” no longer mattered. Traffic could do whatever it wanted to do. I was no longer vulnerable to it.

The next moment, I pictured what would be a more desirable situation—wide open spaces and smooth sailing all the way to my destination. The creation was easy. (And each of us is creating constantly throughout our lives. As children of God, it is our nature to create. The only thing is, we are rarely impressed, because our creation is usually a maintenance of the status quo—reality.) Allowing that creation into the time stream, I had perfect confidence of the result. With ego completely missing, my humility was profound. The next moment, the car directly in front of me moved into the already crowded lane to the right. Left and right, cars moved into those lanes, leaving the lane in front of me entirely empty. Within moments, the dream was realized.

Over two thousand cars and their drivers participated in that realization. It wasn’t for me—the “me” called Carl Martin. I could have cared less about getting to my destination sooner. My frustration had vanished. The only important thing to me right then (and ever more, now) was that of awakening the god within.

Calling myself a son of God—or a “baby god”—seems to have ego written all over it. And, yes, ego tries to take over that bit of apparent puffery. Part of the difficulty is putting ego behind one’s self—one’s true, immortal self. Returning to humility, again and again, is getting easier. I have tasted perfect confidence, yet, at times, it seems as elusive as a dream. And yet, I continue to dream.

What examples do you have from your own life of “humble confidence?”

Originally published as “Humble Confidence,” 2008:0919–13:32, and as ” Stuck with Making Life Work? Try This,” 2011:1115–07:07 at blog.ancientsuns.com

Posted in Confidence, Happiness, Spirituality | Leave a comment

Now is so Passé

Buddhist monk contemplating the now

Buddhist monk in meditation contemplating the now and other things. Photo by Tevaprapas Makklay, CC BY 3.0, via Wikipedia.org.

So many people talk about living in the “now,” instead of the past or the future. But I’m here to tell you that “now” is out of style. It’s old fashioned.

“Now” is the aggregate summation of yesterday. It is the end product of all those old vectors of momentum that have collided to produce what we see, hear and feel as this current moment. “Now” is riddled with the past. It has the stench of the “past” running through every fiber of it.

So, what should we be looking at? If “now” is passé, where should you be dwelling, if not the past, present or future?

Your zone of creation—that’s where it’s at. This is you tapped into the Source of all things. This is you being friends again with the Big Kahuna—the Head Honcho of this universe. This is you being at one again with who you really are.

Living in the “Now”

Einstein - great thinker on the idea of now, time and space

Albert Einstein spent a lifetime contemplating now (time) in relation to space, energy and mass. Photo by Oren Jack Turner, PD, via Wikipedia.org.

Living in the “now” is like being a slave to the past. Certainly, you have to acknowledge what’s happening now, otherwise you’d merely be living in a delusion. But you’re bigger than that. You’re bigger than the “now.” Your zone of creation is what powers the future.

The problem with most people is that they look to the “now” to get their input for creating the future. They create by “default.” They’re running on automatic. Their creation reinforces the status quo and by doing so, they become a cog in the machine. Not a pretty sight, that.

If you want change, you have to be willing to get outside your comfort zone.

“Comfortable?” you ask. “I’m not comfortable with debt and heartache. Debt is not in my comfort zone.”

Certainly, we’re not talking about physical comfort. We’re talking about spiritual comfort. We’re talking about the product of your decisions. You have decided that you are more comfortable “feeling” worry and concern. It’s your decision. You decided to be here where you are now. Your comfort zone is not something you consciously wish for yourself, but you have to take responsibility for it. Blaming it on circumstances or the government will only cripple you.

Moving Beyond Now

When you reinvigorate the joy of dreaming, your dreams cannot help but move toward you. The thrill of savoring your dream’s details opens the door to their accomplishment.

So long as you look at dreams with regret, worry or some other negative emotion, you are not living the dream. Some worry that living the dream is living in a delusion. They caution themselves and others to “get real” or “be reasonable.” But they miss the bigger picture. Every big breakthrough in civilization occurred by someone being decidedly “unreasonable.” They looked beyond the traditional way of looking at things and imagined a solution outside of the current “box” of thought. Einstein’s dreams led to Relativity and Christ’s faith led to miracles.

Creating Miracles

A beautiful now with double rainbow

A beautiful “now” with two rainbows. Photo by Nicholas A. Tonelli, CC BY 2.0, via Wikipedia.org.

My marriage had ended a decade earlier, but I had been in no hurry to find someone new. After ten years of being single and no dating, I decided to make a change. This time, though, I would do it right. I started with a list of desirable traits, but I held only a few of them as mandatory. Which ones? She had to be spiritual and honorable. She had to place great value on telling the truth and she had to know she is a spiritual being in possession of a human body.

I looked far an near. I looked on the internet, because it allowed me to search a great number of traits with relative ease. Of course, my two key traits would have to be verified through getting to know the person. But a year of searching left me with no one and feeling no closer to my goal.

Then it struck me that I had been going about it all wrong. I had spent a year feeling lonely and frustrated only to have that feeling build my future. Like the old saying goes, you can’t make a silk purse out of a pig’s ear. Rotten feelings cannot build a beautiful future.

In late April, 2007, I decided to feel “in love.” I decided to practice this feeling in every way I could.

The realist would say, “this is merely living a lie—wallowing in a delusion.” But the realist is wrong.

What’s the difference? The person living in a delusion is unaware of reality. Let that thought sink in for a moment.

So long as you are aware of reality, you’re not living in a delusion. This is one key difference between delusion and creation. The other key difference is that of awareness vs. attention.

  • In a delusion, awareness is on the delusion, while attention is on reality.
  • In creation, awareness is on reality, while attention is on the object of your desire.

Why this distinction between awareness and attention? Because awareness is perception (effect) and attention is creation (cause). Awareness is conscious thought, while attention is subconscious feeling.

For two weeks, I practiced “feeling in love.” I would go to the grocery or hardware store and pull out my cell phone as if answering it. “Hi, sweetheart…. No, nothing this evening…. That sounds great. What time?… Okay, my darling. Eight o’clock. I’ll see you then. I love you. Bye for now.”

Who was I talking to? My nameless lover. The girl of my dreams. The woman I’m going to marry. Doing this in public made it all the more real. No one knew I was talking to an inactive phone.

On May 5, 2007, she contacted me! Through one of the websites of which I had become a member, she left me a note. Hundreds of hours of chatting and less than six months later, we were married. I had quit my lucrative job as a software engineer and had moved to the Philippines to be with her.

Don’t Live in the Now

Yes, the “now” is passé. It is so “yesterday” wrapped up in a ribbon of vivid reality. With the “now,” you remain a cog in the machine of physical “truth.” You don’t want that.

Living strictly in the “now” is like being a passenger in the back seat, but no driver—only the grooves and bumps on the road to give your vehicle direction. By slipping into your zone of creation, you take over the wheel and direct your vehicle with conscious certainty.

Instead of being a victim of the past, start living the reality you want to live. Even if it isn’t visibly there yet, start living it, now. Do it in comfortable pieces, if you must. Take one thing at a time and practice it until you are comfortable with your new life. When an opportunity shows up, move on it. Keep your awareness on reality but your attention on the dream.

Make it a good dream and a brilliant reality.

Okay, now what success stories do you have to tell about changes you’ve made in your life? What questions or challenges do you want to share?

Posted in Confidence, Happiness, Relationships, Spirituality | Leave a comment

Spiritual Answers in a Physical World — Nature vs. Spirit

Why talk of spiritual answers in a physical world? Recently, I saw a video interview with neurosurgeon and author, Eben Alexander, M.D., about his book, Proof of Heaven, A Neurosurgeon’s Journey into the Afterlife.

In case you’re interested, here it is:

In it, Dr. Alexander challenges his own prior worldview, discussing the fine points of an experience which is rich in details and thoroughly unbelievable to a secular scientist or naturalist. Dr. Alexander gives spiritual answers for something that baffled his understanding of how the mind and the brain work.

Dr. Alexander’s brain had shut down, according to him. During that time, he experienced a journey to a spiritual realm—to heaven itself.

Is Science Against Spiritual Answers?

The video intrigued me so much, I searched for more information on Dr. Alexander, his background and his new book. The Wikipedia article caught my eye, particularly the skepticism of the doctor’s critics.

Sam Harris, also a neuroscientist, “found his account ‘alarmingly unscientific’.”

Wikipedia goes on to say,

“Neurologist and writer Oliver Sacks agreed with Harris, saying that ‘to deny the possibility of any natural explanation for an NDE [near-death experience], as Dr. Alexander does, is more than unscientific — it is antiscientific.’”

What Sacks says is particularly revealing about a prevalent, but ignored bias in science. Yes, bias. Say Dr. Alexander allows for the possibility of a “natural” explanation. Would Mr. Sacks allow for the possibility of a spiritual one? Probably not, because spiritual answers wouldn’t be “scientific.” Or would they?

How could Mr. Sacks explain Moses parting the sea, or Jesus and his disciple, Peter, walking on water? Don’t believe in miracles? I’ve seen similar miracles in my own lifetime. To me, the only explanations would be spiritual answers instead of “natural” ones.

What if the truth is that Dr. Alexander’s experience was entirely spiritual and not physical. What if all attempts at achieving a “natural” answer are inherently futile? Would that mean that science is impotent in some areas?

I grew up with logic and mathematics. While others were good in sports or music, I thrived on advanced algebra and trigonometry. But logic and mathematics are not the answer to everything.

It may be logical to hold a grudge when someone murders your closest family members, but forgiveness is a superior position. Resentment is a ball-and-chain that traps you in the past. Forgiveness sets you free.

Why is it Important to Protect Spiritual Answers?

Not everyone has the right spiritual answers. In fact, it’s quite possible that all interpretations of spiritual answers are wrong. Just look at how many denominations Christianity has. Even Judaism has its sects with opposing viewpoints.

More than protecting spiritual answers from a secular world, it’s also important to protect our freedom to pursue spiritual answers from the overtly religious who might otherwise force their worldview on others.

The world is becoming increasingly polarized and divided. That’s not a good thing.

There are many concerns we each share with our fellow human beings. That should be enough to keep us together, moving toward a common goal of understanding, freedom and responsibility. But forces are at work in our society that are actively dividing us—secularists vs. the religious, fundamentalists vs. new agers, Democrats vs. Republicans, and more.

Increasingly, we find people using hateful language like, “religion is the source of all evil.” And I thought it was supposed to be “money.” In the final analysis, it seems that every endeavor of man has the potential for evil—not just religion or banking. The root of all evil is selfishness—ego. Ego is right and everyone else is wrong. Ego is entitled to government handouts, but no one else. Ego is “patriotic,” but unwilling to defend liberty itself.

Only spiritual answers can solve our problems, because the source of all our problems is the antithesis of spirit—ego.

Scientists who are also naturalists, use ego rather than logic, when they condemn spiritual answers or refuse to accept them as a possibility. Science works quite well in a created world, just as it does in a naturalist’s world. But the things of spirit are lost in the world of cogs and wheels. Miracles are impossible in an entirely deterministic realm. But I’ve seen dozens of miracles. I wouldn’t want to lose the freedom to pursue spiritual answers. I wouldn’t want to put intolerant naturalists in charge of deciding what’s wrong and what’s right. We need to protect spiritual answers as well as scientific ones. I don’t like the idea of a biblical literalist deciding what goes into our science textbooks.

I think free speech is a good thing. America used to have it, but U.S. legislation has become increasingly tyrannical—the unpatriotic “Patriot Act,” the NDAA (with its indefinite detention clauses for American citizens), HR 347 (which makes free speech a felony in some instances), and the president’s “Kill List” which includes American citizens on it. American Congress has repeatedly attempted to censor the Internet with bills like SOPA, PIPA, CISPA, TPP and others.

What are your thoughts if someone were to impose their viewpoint on you? What if the government banned your worldview and made it illegal?

Posted in Happiness, Spirituality | Leave a comment

How to Survive the Biggest Pyramid Scheme in History

Pyramid Scheme?

Dollar pyramid - symbol of the biggest pyramid scheme everThe U.S. dollar. Yes, that’s right. The Federal Reserve note is a debt-based currency and Congress and the private Federal Reserve are burning through them at an ever increasing, and non-sustainable rate. The American national debt was a frightening $5 Trillion before 9/11. With President Bush, it virtually doubled in 8 years to $10 Trillion. Then, with President Obama, the national debt skyrocketed in 4 years to $16.3 Trillion, further accelerating the rate of indebtedness.

But is it right to call the Federal Reserve System a pyramid scheme?

Wikipedia tells us,

A pyramid scheme is a non-sustainable business model that involves promising participants payment or services, primarily for enrolling other people into the scheme, rather than supplying any real investment or sale of products or services to the public.

The Fed creates money out of thin air and supplies this newborn fiction to banks and they are permitted to loan out ten times this new money at interest. This practice of loaning more than you have is called “fractional reserve lending.” Don’t you just love those fancy terms? And wouldn’t you love to have that ability for yourself? I suppose only if you liked getting rich by doing nothing at all.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has suggested raising the limit on “fractional lending” so that banks can loan an infinite amount of money for every dollar they hold in reserves. Or they could have zero dollars in reserves, too, and still loan out any amount.

So, each bank is adding to the pyramid scheme by suckering more people to borrow their debt-based currency. The “promise to pay” implied in every dollar is becoming more and more difficult to live up to. And this erosion is devaluing existing dollars. In fact, the devaluing has been going on ever since the Fed took over, a century ago.

The Federal Reserve System is a privately-owned Central Bank—owned by private banks who are, in turn, owned by private individuals. It is about as “Federal” as “Federal Express.” Try taking a filming crew into property owned by the Fed and you will be asked to leave their private property. Filming in a truly Federal building is perfectly okay, because it is public property. The Fed isn’t.

Each dollar is a “promise” of value, plus a percentage of debt. You have to pay back the dollar, plus interest. The problem is that there is never enough money in circulation to pay back all dollars and the accrued interest. Such a system is non-sustainable. Eventually the amount of debt will exceed the existing quantity of currency in circulation (if it hasn’t already).

And someone is pushing on the accelerator of this runaway train, pumping up the level of debt at faster and faster rates.

Debt is a form of slavery. And because the American public can never pay off their debt, they became, in 1913, debt slaves to the private Federal Reserve System and their owners. Gee, and you thought this was the land of the Free and home of the Brave.

Great Depression dust bowl, deepened by the Fed's great pyramid scheme

South Dakota, 1936, during the Dust Bowl of the Great Depression — a financial slump only deepened by the great pyramid scheme of the Fed and its policies.

The “Fed” was touted as a way to ensure bank runs and other problems like that of 1907 would never happen again. Did it work? How about the economic problems of the early 1920s? How about the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the subsequent Great Depression. Instead of increasing the money supply to help the nation bounce back, the Fed tightened the money supply, deepening the Depression to an extreme. So much for the “Fed” solution.

Another great “solution” pushed on the American people in 1913, was the private income tax. If you still use a written, paper check to pay your taxes, they come back stamped deposited in the “FRS” (Federal Reserve System). Who owns this Central Bank? No one really knows for sure (unless you’re an insider), but G. Edward Griffin’s book, The Creature from Jekyll Island, offers some clues. Would you believe the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds and people like them?

But it isn’t just the money they’re after. It’s the influence. Washington listens to the Fed, but the Fed doesn’t have to answer the tough questions. In fact, retired representative Ron Paul had to create a bill just to force the Fed to reveal what they were doing with all of our money—not just a monetary audit, but revealing the policies they set and the deals they make with foreign Central Banks. The bill passed through the House by an overwhelming majority. The then current Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, blocked the bill from being discussed in the Senate, so it died with the end of the last Congress. You people in Nevada should elect a different Senator. But if it’s another Corporate Party stooge, then we haven’t gained anything for America.

Leaving bankers to govern the ethics of bankers is a bit like employees deciding how much work they have to do for the week, or letting the foxes control their entry into the hen house. All things being equal, selfishness takes over.

Pyramid Scheme Set to Collapse, or Alarmist’s Hysteria?

Crystal ball -- not needed to see how this pyramid scheme is going to end

You don’t need a crystal ball to see how this pyramid scheme is going to end. Just look at history. Photo: Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff, CC BY-SA 2.5, via Wikipedia.org.

Wouldn’t it be nice to have a crystal ball? You could pick stocks by the minute and win with every upswing and downturn. Hook that crystal ball into a computer and have the whole thing run on autopilot. Sweet! Don’t you think the owners of the Central Banks could benefit from this kind of manipulation? When they influence the value of stocks and precious metals, I’m sure insider trading does not apply to them.

Without such niceties, we’re left to look at the facts we have available to us. For instance, American public debt is skyrocketing and unsustainable. Given the fact that a debt-based currency can never be paid off, we’re left with the reality of an ever-increasing debt load which will keep increasing until the country is bankrupt. Just imagine what that will do to international finances when the dollar becomes worthless.

One possible solution is to create a competitive currency—a silver-backed dollar or a gold-backed dollar, like we used to have. Start paying off the Fed’s debt-based dollars and wean the country of that form of currency. The value of Fed dollars keeps going down, and I would not be surprised if gold-dollars held a constant or increasing value.

But this solution, by itself, would not be enough. We would need to eliminate the insane spending of the Federal government.

Imagine you make $100,000 per year, but you spend $200,000 per year on your credit card. Your credit card company keeps bumping up your credit limit every time you get close to your ceiling. Nice, right? Sound familiar? The American Federal government does this, along with its partner in crime, the private Fed. But what happens when you owe so much on your credit card that your $100,000 per year in income is not enough to pay the interest each year? When does such a scheme fall apart?

Are these your elected officials? Wouldn’t it be nice to know who voted on what so we could kick out the insane ones and keep the good ones? Ah, but the Corporate Party owns the news media that tells you who is good and who isn’t. So, how do you ever know for certain, if you only ever listen to the Corporate Party news? You don’t.

And increasingly, legislative bills are introduced for voting so quickly that congressmen have no time to read them! That’s like driving blindfolded. Personally, I can’t believe America has gotten this crazy.

Frankly, I don’t see enough people snapping out of their Normalcy Bias to do enough about it soon enough.

Thriving Despite the Pyramid Scheme Bubble Burst

The best way to thrive despite the runaway train that is America is to distance yourself from paper assets. Okay, maybe you still use dollars, but convert them quickly into real assets. Try using barter as much as possible. Your friendly IRS agent won’t like this, but how are they going to put a dollar value on the barter transaction? And if one dollar changes hands, does that mean your house for their yacht is only a $1 transaction? Talk to your tax attorney about such things.

Frankly, I’m beginning to agree with a few politicians who tell us that taxation is legalized theft. One look at where the tax dollars go, and it’s easy to agree with that sentiment. Does America need military bases in nearly every country on the planet? Do we need so many in uniform overseas when 9/11 was really an inside job? (And if you still believe the Bush “official conspiracy theory,” then you really haven’t looked at the evidence.)

Boycott the corporations. I wonder if there are any truly ethical corporations left. There may be, but many of the largest conglomerates don’t care squat about America or “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Halliburton stands as one of the more egregious examples of wholesale greed at the expense of lives and honesty. Interesting how Vice President Dick Cheney still received payments from his former company especially when they were given those lucrative Iraq War contracts. Can anyone spell “conflict of interest?”

The dollar pyramid scheme is going to go bust. This pyramid scheme, like all others, is unsustainable. It’s only a matter of when.

vegetable garden -- one way to survive the dollar pyramid scheme bustCities are perhaps the last place you should think of living. Growing your own food should be high on your list. Stocking non-perishable foods and water should also be high on your list. Guns and ammunition might be a good thing to get early on, before the Second Amendment is repealed like so many parts of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, so far.

Under certain circumstances, it is now a felony to protest what the government is doing. That’s right. Free speech is no longer entirely free. You can go to jail for a decade, if a Secret Service agent doesn’t like what you yell or the words printed on your t-shirt.

The erosion of rights is so gradual that most people don’t think anything of it. Like the proverbial frog, though, when the water starts to boil, it will be too late to do anything about it. So, in order to thrive despite the coming pyramid scheme bubble burst, you need to act early.

And despite the apparently undeserved misfortune of all this tyranny, learn to forgive. You can’t be truly happy if you’re lugging a ball and chain of resentment behind you.

What ideas do you have for surviving the coming dollar pyramid scheme bust?

Posted in Confidence, Happiness, Wealth | Leave a comment

Law of Attraction and Turning the Other Cheek

Law of Attraction - look of successPerhaps it should come as no surprise that the master of miracles and spiritual ascension should give us the wisdom of the Law of Attraction nearly 2,000 years ago. You reap what you sow. You get what you dwell on.

And if you truly understand what turning the other cheek is, then the Law of Attraction becomes far easier to use.

The real trick with the Law of Attraction is to take responsibility for your feelings, because feelings are where the attraction gets energized. If you feel anxious or worried, then you will attract more things to feel anxious or worried about. If you feel happy, you’ll attract more things to feel happy about.

Turning the Other Cheek and Miracle on Wilshire Boulevard

Late one afternoon in 1977, a miracle happened. The place: Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles. At first, I was grumpy, frustrated and angry at other drivers for cutting me off. Six times within two minutes, other drivers jerked their cars, without warning, into the meager space in front of my own. Dangerous? Absolutely. Each time, my brakes squealed with hurried intent to avoid collision.

After the sixth time, with rage about to pop a gasket, I realized that I had created not only my feelings, but the events in my space toward which I could aim my frustration. Suddenly, I took 100% responsibility for their actions. All frustration, anxiety, worry and rage disappeared. It was now impossible for me to be a victim.

The next moment, I pictured clearly in my mind, wide open spaces and smooth sailing all the way to my destination. The moment I let go of that thought, the center lane in front of me started a rapid evacuation. In less than 5 seconds, 2 miles of Wilshire Boulevard lay empty in front of me, with the lanes left and right impossibly, doubly thick with bumper-to-bumper traffic.

For the next 4 minutes, I moved ahead without one person moving their vehicle into the empty space ahead of me. After that, traffic was sparse and I was at my destination.

From Self-Perception to Sculpting Your Own Feelings

The more you refine your perception of what you’re creating—especially in your feelings—the more control you will be able to exercise over what you create.

Undoubtedly, confidence is an attractive trait. In a group, who gets the most admiration—the wimp or the confident, but humble member? The confident one, of course.

If someone has a natural confidence that comes from within, they’re far more likely to stay confident when trouble strikes, than one who depends on external factors.

If someone depends on feedback from others to feel good about themselves, they’ll thrive when everything is going well, but flounder when things go sour. You need to develop within yourself a confidence that no one or no thing can touch.

Law of Attraction and Ego vs. the True Self

What does “turning the other cheek” have to do with the “Law of Attraction?” It has to do with viewpoint.

Did you know there are two of you? Besides the obvious physical component—your body—there are two selves dwelling within your personal identity. One of them remains asleep in most people. This is the “true self”—the immortal child of God, soul or Holy Ghost.

The other “self” goes by the name of “ego.” This is the part that is vulnerable. This is the part that dwells on scarcity and harbors resentment for apparent wrongs done against it.

Tony Robbins once said, “Those who always look for what they can get out of something are living in scarcity.” This is the ego viewpoint. This is the sense of entitlement and the source of selfishness.

When someone else does something to you that injures you in some way, ego flares up and resents that apparent attack, whether or not it was intended as an attack.

Turning the other cheek subdues ego. It puts you in the position of being more powerful than the perceived hurt. It swaps viewpoint from ego to the spiritual self. Of course, if you deny that you have a spiritual self, then you automatically cripple yourself.

And turning the other cheek thrusts you into the viewpoint of abundance. By turning the other cheek you are taking 100% responsibility and that makes being a victim impossible.

Everyone Wins

When you turn the other cheek, everyone wins—yes, even the perpetrator. They may not know it yet, but you’ve given them powerful wisdom. What they do with that valuable seed is up to them. If they squander the gift, then that’s their loss.

When have you turned the tables on your own ego? What was the result?

Posted in Confidence, Happiness, Spirituality | Leave a comment

Science is Biased and Likely You Are Too

Science is biased? This is not what a scientist wants to hear. In fact, most scientists probably would be quite skeptical of this idea. But by the very act of skepticism, they are being biased. As I eventually found, it’s very difficult to avoid bias altogether.

A Lifetime Love of Science, Logic and Mathematics

Science is biased, but still able to put Sputnik in orbitI started out this life going to movies that stretched my mind. Even as an infant, my parents would take me to the drive-in to watch all manner of movies, including tales of alien invasion. By the time I started school, I was well-versed in the idea of alien worlds and space travel, despite the fact that Sputnik was still a dream in some Russian scientist’s mind. The family encyclopedia found me pouring over its pages, especially in the astronomy section.

In fact, I lived in a family of geniuses and, at times, it was hard to keep up. My own IQ has tested at various times at 138–140—borderline genius by some standards or merely far above average by others. But in my family, I was the underachiever on IQ. Both of my parents were smart and it affected how my three brothers and I grew up. If I remember correctly,

  • Terry had a 169,
  • Larry a 149 and
  • Ken was off the charts.

The tester had written on Ken’s IQ test, “immeasurable, far above 200.” And what Larry lacked in IQ, he made up with high EQ (emotional quotient)—very sociable, outgoing and empathetic—a very open and genuine person. I love all three of my brothers and they do a good job of making me feel smart. They’re even tolerant when I don’t immediately get it.

Throughout school, getting high grades was pretty normal—usually “A’s” and “B’s.” Mathematics was particularly easy. But in high school, I started to get bored with it all. In advanced algebra and trigonometry class, I wanted to know from the teacher what use the quadratic equation was in real life—what application did it have? He looked immediately stunned and then said, “You’ll learn that in college.” I suspect he didn’t learn that in college, otherwise he could’ve answered my earnest question. I certainly did not learn that in college, despite his promise to the contrary, but the teacher knew how to deflect a question he couldn’t answer, and thus prevent seeming too ignorant. Perhaps it would’ve been more honest to say, “I don’t know.”

Trouble in Academia

Sylvanus P. Thompson knew science is biased.

Sylvanus P. Thompson, author of the ever popular, “Calculus Made Easy” (1910).

How could it be that science is biased? One of the first clues came several years after high school, and before I decided to go to college for my degree, I was working in Hollywood as an artist. I was also hungry to write science fiction. For one story, I wanted to get my atmospheric science correct, so I started to research. Quickly, I found I needed to know calculus.

I bought two used textbooks at the local college bookstore and started studying. That was painful. I would read in one textbook until I couldn’t go any further, then I’d switch to the other one, attempting to read the same subject matter from their slightly different viewpoint. Then I would have an epiphany! “Oh, that’s what they’re talking about. That’s simple. Why do they have to make it sound so difficult?”

Yes, it seems the mathematicians who wrote those textbooks were great at math, but lousy at writing. And lousy at teaching!

I searched the bookstores for something better. Finally, at Pickwick Bookstore on Hollywood Boulevard, I spotted “Calculus Made Easy,” by Sylvanus P. Thompson. I was immediately in love with calculus. I had thought that the book was merely another in a series of “Made Easy” books that were popping up all over in the late 70′s.

I was surprised to discover that this book had been through dozens of reprintings starting in 1910! Why couldn’t more textbook writers be like him? Why were publishers purposefully obfuscating the subject? Calculus is not complicated! Many calculus textbook writers, it seemed, were merely incompetent.

Discovering a New Talent

Stars in the NeighborHood software, despite that science is biasedWhile still an artist, I took a correspondence course in electronic engineering. That was fun. Here, mathematics was being applied to real-world examples. In one of my lessons, I learned how tuning circuits worked for radio broadcast and reception. The heart of the circuit was something called the “tank”—a coil and capacitor in parallel. As I was reading about this wonderful invention, I started to get goosebumps.

Suddenly, I realized that I was surrounded by tank circuits—trillions of them! Every atom is a coil (electron orbiting its nucleus) and a capacitor (negative electron separated from a positive nucleus). Suddenly, what I had learned about absorption and emission spectra in astronomy all made sense. Atoms were “broadcasting” certain frequencies and “receiving” those same frequencies. I wonder how many of my fellow students ever had this realization. I was becoming aware of my own talent for recognizing patterns.

After I had started college, I wrote a 3D astronomy program, “Stars in the NeighborHood.” Computers had become powerful enough and monitors and graphics cards had become advanced enough to display all the colors I had long wanted as an artist.

Cracks in the Ivory Tower of Science

Plato knew science was biasedI had also long been interested in human prehistory, myth and legend. I was particularly interested in Plato’s lost Atlantis. In the early 2000′s, I found a burning urge to write a novel. I had already accumulated over a thousand pages of notes that were ripe as background for such a project.

I was lucky enough to have a year to dedicate to the project. I researched and wrote full time. I had been aware of science’s disdain for Atlantis, but my research turned up much more of this ugly prejudice. Emotionally charged words laced the literature—”fringe,” “crackpot,” “pseudoscience” and the like. I started to suspect the nature of science itself—that science is biased. Why were scientists being so subjective and illogical about Atlantis?

In the October, 2004 issue of Scientific American, for instance, Michael Shermer (Mr. Skepticism), offered a short piece on the significance of Atlantis. He wrote, “What if Plato made up the story for mythic purposes? He did.” There are several problems with his statement. Not only does Mr. Shermer jump to a conclusion without discussion, he offers no proof for his conclusion. He dismisses all ideas that Atlantis was anything but a contrived story used as a parable. But how does Mr. Shermer “know” this? Is he omniscient? Did he interview the long-dead Greek philosopher?

A few years after this, Dr. Greg Little, psychologist, discovered some ruins off the coast of Bimini Island, in the Bahamas. He asked a friend, a professor of archaeology, to investigate, but his friend politely refused. Why? It would jeopardize his career. Bimini was associated with the Atlantis myth, and any scientist who gave any credence to the Atlantis story would immediately be shunned by his peers. Yes, science is biased. Science by intimidation.

Then, in my research, I learned of the “Clovis first” dogma. Any scientist who attempted to dig below the Clovis horizon (the historical strata of the first Clovis settlement) was immediately ridiculed. Science by ridicule.

Do scientists ridicule others?

They most assuredly do. How primitive!

Science is Biased: A Pattern of Misbehavior

The more I read, the more I realized that science, though pretty cool, did not have the best of stewards overlooking its progress. I found multiple examples of fraud, countless examples of self-indulgent ridicule and innumerable examples of distortion and self-congratulatory ignorance.

What if someone shown a light on such behavior and made scientists aware of these drawbacks? Could we overcome the fact that science is biased? Would science experience a new Renaissance? Don’t I wish. But ego gets in the way.

The more I dug, the more I realized that ego is an equal-opportunity crippler. It attacks all aspects of humanity, not just science. You can find ego in government, religion, families, clubs, schools and more. Ego is divisive. It stands for entitlement and self-superiority.

I couldn’t understand how a group which proclaims to hold such high ideals could be running rampant with such illogical behavior.

Scientific Fraud

Helping to prove that science is biased, George Bush and 9/11.

Could George W. Bush have been amongst those behind 9/11? It’s a scandalous question, but should it be asked? Photo 9/11: National Park Service, PD, via Wikipedia. Photo Bush: Agência Brasil, CC BY 3.0, via Wikipedia.

Ten years after the tragedy of 9/11, a friend coaxed me to look deeper into the event. I had my misgivings about the official theories, but had not given it much thought. What I found at first dismayed and distressed me. I felt gut-kicked. Suddenly, the official story was obviously a lie. And blatant crimes were committed in broad daylight, like Mayor Giuliani destroying crime scene evidence before the scene could be properly investigated. Within 3 or 4 months, “ground zero” had been scrubbed, the steel beams sold and shipped to China, and all this a full year before the “official” 9/11 investigation began.  As one scientist so poignantly put, you can’t do science if the evidence is missing. Top military officers responsible for the security failures on 9/11 were each given promotions instead of courts martial.

Had there been other lies? The missing WMDs of Iraq came to mind. Oops! But with 9/11, government scientists were lying about science!

A third building goes into free-fall collapse on 9/11 and NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology) scientists treat it as the obvious result of office fires and lopsided damage from the collapse of the twin towers, earlier that day. But only because science is biased does asymmetrical damage ever lead to symmetrical collapse.

The truly obvious implications of free-fall immediately debunk the NIST findings. How? Buildings never go into free-fall unless all of the supports are cut. Not crushed, as NIST suggests. Crushing takes work. Crushing slows down the collapse. Free-fall means no slowing down. NIST lied!

How Does Such Dishonesty Exist in Science?

One could just as easily ask, how does dishonesty exist in any human endeavor?

Then I reread the definition of “scientific method.” In that definition, it warned against bias. Suddenly, I realized that science had been working with the wrong paradigm all this time. Skepticism, even in its most benign form, contains the potent bias of doubt. My God! Science is biased!

Scientists have become addicted to skepticism. They are veritable “doubt” junkies.

For most scientific efforts, the more benign form of skepticism still works pretty well, because the restraint and humility built into skepticism allows the scientist to discover the next relative “truth.” Obviously, no one can discover anything if they think they know it all in advance. Suddenly, I realized that all of the problems in science could be drawn back to this problem—ego and the self-indulgent attitude that one knows it all, or at least knows all there is about a specific patch of human knowledge.

But skepticism has a dark side. When scientists ridicule other scientists as they did when two men discovered “cold fusion,” all of humanity suffers. That’s ego. When a scientist or skeptic uses unsupported dismissiveness, as did Michael Shermer in his 2004 article, we all lose. And ego wins.

When discussing this in forums, you encounter all manner of opinion. Most of it is defensive of science, as if skepticism and science were joined at the hip for eternity. They think science is not biased, but that I am. Of course I am, but I knew that already.

But if not skepticism, what should the paradigm of science be? Why not “restraint” and “humility?” Both of these together accomplish the purpose of skepticism, but without the bias of “doubt.” And restraint and humility prevent the darker forms of skepticism from manifesting.

We can all move away from bias by being self-aware, but a better approach is in eliminating ego—putting love of others ahead of self.

Imagine that. Science without ridicule. No more “science is biased.” I like it.

Now, tell me: What forms of bias have you found in science?

Posted in Education, Spirituality | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Certainty — The Crutch of ‘Knowing it Can Be Done’

Certainty: FA-18 Hornet, breaking sound barrier.

FA-18 Hornet, breaking sound barrier. Photo: Ensign John Gay, U.S. Navy, PD, via Wikipedia.org

Is certainty a crutch? Sometimes it can be. It depends on how that certainty is formed.

When Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier in 1947, many of his fellow pilots were decidedly uncertain it could be done. Some suggested that he should be fully insured. A few of his peers had already died trying. There was little certainty that such a physical barrier could be pierced. Yeager is said to have been very certain that it could be broken. “What barrier?”

A more arbitrary barrier—the four-minute mile—was broken by Roger Bannister in 1954. What makes this more subjective is the nature of both the mile and the minute. Both are arbitrary units of measure that have no direct relation to one’s ability to run.

Certainty of Chuck Yeager in his Bell X-1.

Chuck Yeager, the man credited with breaking the sound barrier, standing in front of the Bell X-1. Photo: US Military, PD-USGOV-MILITARY, via Wikipedia.org

Yeager’s “sound barrier,” on the other hand, was a very real and physical obstacle; it involved a tangible change of state between subsonic and supersonic travel. That boundary is marked by the rather noisy “sonic boom.” In fact, the crack of a whip is just such a “sonic boom.”

And yet Bannister’s breakthrough on the track suddenly unleashed a flurry of copycats, just as did Yeager’s performance in the air. Suddenly, everyone was certain it could be done, because someone else had already done it.

Something about the fact that it had already been done gave others the crutch of certainty they needed to duplicate the feat. You might want to re-read that last sentence again. There is a world of wisdom and inspiration in it.

This distinction gives us an advantage. How? Breakthroughs are all around us waiting to happen for the first time. All it takes is someone with the right accident or the right, brazen certainty to find them.

Now, if you want to go through life accidentally, as so many on this planet seemed destined to do, have at it. On the other hand, if you want to accomplish something no one else has done, simply write it down in detail and imagine yourself already there. Don’t just think it—feel it.

Certainty of the Children of Atlantis and the Start of Civilization

Certainty despite inferior numbers, Pizzaro takes the Inca

Pizzaro attacking the Inca leader, Atahualpa, in Peru, with inferior numbers. Painting: Sir John Everett Millais, PD, via Wikipedia.org

Jared Diamond, in his best-selling book, Guns, Germs and Steel, proposed the idea that passive elements of geography increased the likelihood of civilization getting a start. He developed some compelling arguments to support that thesis. In Eurasia, humans had the latitude to expand and mix ideas—from one longitude to another. Humans resist changes in latitude, because of the changes in climate, temperature, and available food. Crops that grow at mid-latitudes likely won’t do well at low or high latitudes.

Starting civilization is not something that is preordained. Most people would likely view such an undertaking as impossible, if they were starting out as simple hunter-gatherers.

But what if someone knew that civilization was already possible? What if the children of Atlantis—descendants of the refugees of that lost island empire—showed the primitives of Eurasia how to plant wheat or rice, how to hew stone and how to bury their dead?

Certainty at Göbekli Tepe, carving stone structure

The certainty that civilization could be created may have helped the people of Göbekli Tepe to create these structures, some 11,500 years ago. Photo: PD, via Wikipedia.org

Don’t believe in Atlantis? That’s okay. Atlantis doesn’t believe in you, either. For decades, skeptics of Atlantis said that there is no evidence of civilization existing that far back. Little did they realize that their skepticism is based on an “argument-to-ignorance” type logical fallacy. All it takes is one piece of evidence to shatter their argument. And, in 1995, scientists began digging at Göbekli Tepe, Turkey, unearthing large stone structures decorated with intricate carvings. The estimated date: 9500 BC—merely a hundred years after Plato’s date for the end of Atlantis. And you have to ask, what other evidence is out there yet to be dug up?

Scientists characterize the site as the oldest known religious structure in the world. They speculate that the builders were hunter-gatherers who may have lived at least part of the year in nearby villages. What if the builders were hunter-gatherers by necessity, rather than by choice?

The site contains 20 round structures. Only 4 of them have been excavated. Wikipedia tells us, “Recent DNA analysis of modern domesticated wheat compared with wild wheat has shown that its DNA is closest in sequence to wild wheat found on Mount Karaca Dağ 20 miles (32 km) away from the site, suggesting that this is where modern wheat was first domesticated.”

For more information on evidence that supports the past possible reality of Atlantis, check out Mission: Atlantis.

Certainty for Building Your Own Future

Certainty doesn’t have to wait for someone else. As with any emotion, you create your own confidence. Sure, you can use conditions in your environment or experience to justify your emotions and confidence, or you can decide to create confidence despite what goes on in your environment.

Realize this: civilization was not built by reasonable people. Reason has its place, but it acts as a double-edged sword. You can be just as confident that something won’t work as you can be that it will work. Either way, you frequently prove yourself right.

Posted in Confidence, Happiness | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Turning the Other Cheek — What it Really Means

Turning the other cheek is an act of love, like this Sri Lankan woman and child

Sri Lankan woman and child. Turning the other cheek is an act of love. Photo: Steve Evans, CC BY 2.0, via Wikipedia.org

Turning the other cheek is not some masochistic desire to hurt yourself. And it’s not a game of one-upmanship to show that you can be the better person. No, both of these purposes are earthly, egotistical concerns.

The idea of “turning the other cheek” contains many ingredients. The first of these is love.

Turning the Other Cheek is an Act of Unconditional Love

The real meaning of turning the other cheek is a spiritual one. It is one of turning the other cheek—giving up your importance of physical things. “You want to hurt this cheek? No problem. And here’s the other one, too.” And this is not said in a flippant manner, but with complete and unconditional love.

In fact, “importances” get in the way of love. Jealousy is a perfect example. A spouse’s preconceived notion for how their partner should behave will create negative emotions, like jealousy, to the degree that those notions are perceived as “important.”

A prized possession, donated or tossed in the garbage by your significant other, can lead to a shouting match because the lost object is judged as “important.”

If you judge anything as “important,” then you make yourself vulnerable should that thing be damaged or stolen—if anything should happen to it that broke your plans or expectations for it. In fact, holding onto your plans and expectations also makes you vulnerable, for they can be taken from you, as well.

Turning the other cheek is entirely unselfish.

The opposite of this idea was portrayed in the movie, “The Usual Suspects,” when fictional character, Keyser Söze, is confronted by criminals holding his family hostage. Instead of remaining vulnerable, Keyser Söze kills his own family members and regains the advantage in the hostage situation. What makes this entirely different is Keyser Söze’s unmitigated selfishness. He gave up his family’s “importance,” but he did it for his own, physical advantage. In other words, he still held his physical self as “important”—more important than the lives of his wife and children.

And that brings us to the next ingredient.

Turning the Other Cheek is an Act of Humility

Turning the other cheek includes humility, like that of a child holding onto an adult.

Turning the other cheek includes humility, like that of a child holding onto an adult. Photo: singhajay, used with permission, via Morguefile.com

Some people look at humility as a condition of weakness. Nothing could be further from the truth. Because humility sometimes looks similar to groveling, it’s easy to get them confused, but they are worlds apart. Humility is the strongest possible position, spiritually, while groveling is a position of weakness both spiritually and physically.

Groveling is entirely selfish—attempting to protect the self by “kissing up” or attempting to pacify someone stronger than yourself. Some may do this when their lives are in jeopardy or the lives of people they love.

Turning the other cheek when your loved ones are in danger from murderers is not a callous, uncaring act. It is the most supreme act of love. In that state of spiritual bliss, you have the power to ask God for safety.

It is an Act of Fearlessness

68th Special Forces paratrooper leaps from C-130J Hercules cargo plane. Turning the other cheek contains a similar fearlessness. Photo: MSgt Quinton T. Burris, USAF, PD, via Wikipedia.org

68th Special Forces paratrooper leaps from C-130J Hercules cargo plane. Turning the other cheek contains a similar fearlessness. Photo: MSgt Quinton T. Burris, USAF, PD, via Wikipedia.org

I remember reading the story of a skydiver who suffered a double failure of his parachutes. He hit the ground at better than a hundred miles per hour. And yet, he walked away with a few scratches and bruises. On the way down, he thought to himself, “God, it looks like I’m coming to meet you.” In other words, he gave up his entire life and gave it to God. He was humble. Within those thoughts were the feelings of “reverence for life,” but not holding any importance on those feelings. He was humble to whatever God would decide, and he was entirely fearless. Then a miracle happened.

I also remember my late father telling me the story of a time when he was a teenager. He got out of his car and accidentally bumped into someone on the sidewalk. The man was nearly twice my father’s weight and quite muscular. He was also quite angry at the unintended assault. Quickly, he pulled back his fist to strike my father.

At this, my father thought to himself, “Well, it looks like I’m a goner.” Instead of flinching, my father merely relaxed and waited for the inevitable. There was no defeatist attitude and no groveling. He merely stood his ground and calmly accepted the “gift” the other man had intended for him. But the man’s fist lost its momentum and dropped to his side. One look at my father and he could no longer hold onto his anger. He simply turned and left.

The Real Meaning of Turning the Other Cheek

Soldier holding another in fireman's carry. Turning the other cheek includes such generosity.

Soldier holding another in fireman’s carry. Turning the other cheek includes such generosity. Photo: Rools, used by permission, via Morguefile.com

Turning the other cheek is a spiritual act of unconditional love and humble fearlessness to any of the possible consequences of the intended assault.

With such spiritual invulnerability, you can no longer be a victim. With this, you remove any possible resentment that could turn you into a perpetrator. And with the “turning the other cheek” attitude, you become far bigger than any problem.

Like the old saying, if someone compels you to walk a mile, walk an extra mile. Give them more than they asked for. During the Roman Empire, citizens were required to help Roman soldiers carry their equipment for up to a mile. Here the suggestion is to give them two miles. Instead of thinking of the Roman soldier as an enemy, think of them as a dearly beloved brother or fellow soldier. Don’t think of the request as a burden, but as an opportunity to display even more love.

What other ingredients do you find in “turning the other cheek?”

Posted in Happiness, Spirituality | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Space, Stars, Galaxies and Nebulae — The Beauty of Our Universe

Galaxy M106, showing stars in our galaxy and nebulae in that galaxy across 23.5 million light years of space.

Galaxy M106, taken by Hubble Space Telescope. Credit: Image Data – Hubble Legacy Archive, Robert Gendler, Jay Gabany; Processing – Robert Gendler. Click on the image to view more detail.

Who can look at one of the thousands of photos produced by the Hubble Space Telescope and not feel awe at the grandeur of our cosmos? Space is so incredibly huge. There are so many countless stars. And even the galaxies number in the billions.

Recently, I fell in love with a couple of images I’d never seen before. One was Hubble’s view of the galaxy M106. The other has the rather peculiar name, the Running Chicken Nebula. They give me goosebumps with their beauty and splendor.

My lifelong love of stars and the cosmos led me to create two websites dedicated to the subject. One covers the gamut from stars and planets, to space travel and science fiction (www.AncientSuns.Com). The other is dedicated to 3D astronomy software I designed and programmed called, “Stars in the NeighborHood” (www.SpaceSoftware.Net).

But there are some who look at these images and feel nothing. Why? Is it because they don’t understand what they’re looking at? Perhaps to some the image is merely smudges of color representing something unknown.

Most of the stars in our night sky are blazing suns far brighter than our own. Only the distance to those beacons of light keep them from blinding us. If the fastest jet could travel through the vacuum of space to the nearest star system, it would take several million years. And that’s just our closest neighbor.

A galaxy can be a set of hundreds of millions up to nearly a trillion stars orbiting a common hub. Some galaxies are spiral, like our own. Some are ellipsoidal. Some are irregular in shape.

Light itself is incredibly fast. If it could be bent into a circle, it could travel around the Earth seven times in one second. And yet light would take 100,000 years to cross from one side of our own Milky Way galaxy to the other.

M106, shown in this picture, is 23.5 million light years away. That’s a distance; not time. It’s the distance light would travel in 23.5 million years. It’s hard to imagine something that far away, and yet this galaxy is relatively nearby. The individual stars in the picture are objects within our own galaxy. We’re peering past them at M106. All of the swirls of color in that galaxy consists of billions of individual stars so far away that we cannot see the individual objects. The dark lanes of dust and some of the brighter spots are called nebulae. Bright nebulae are dust clouds that are more energetic and emit their own light. Dark nebulae are cold dust clouds that merely obscure the light of stars behind them.

That one beautiful galaxy may have millions of worlds like Earth, each with their own civilization. Think about that for a moment. Imagine having a starship that can travel to that galaxy in days and hop from one star system to another in minutes. Imagine vacationing on some of those exotic worlds. That’s the type of thing I’ve imagined for nearly 60 years.

One of the more colorful nebulae in space, the Running Chicken.

Of all the nebulae I’ve seen, the Running Chicken Nebula is one of the more lovely in our galaxy. Credit: ESO, CC BY 3.0, via Wikipedia.org. Click on the image to view more detail.

This picture of a nebula is equally stunning. The bright, reddish colors are not clouds of stars, as in the picture of the galaxy, but are merely unimaginably large clouds of dust billions and even trillions of miles across. Light would take several years to cross from one side of this nebula to the other. It consists of largely bright nebular material, emitting its own light, but there are small pockets of dark nebular material which might be the birthplace of new stars, formed by the collapse of those clouds into massive knots of matter which will eventually spark with the nuclear flame of hydrogen fusion.

Imagine living on a world near such a nebula so that your night sky was painted with its light.

Yes, we live in an unimaginably huge universe containing many wonders. Sometimes it’s nice to step back from the craziness of our day-to-day grind and think about all that space out there, and to imagine the stars, the nebulae and galaxies that make up our universe.

Posted in Education, Happiness | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Shocking Health Scam — Compassionate Medical Doctors and Those Who Don’t Care

Dr. Evil, symbol of health scams everywhere.

Doctor Evil. Image credits: Kozzi.com (doctor), Morguefile.com (flame). PD-US

For most of my 62 years, I had no concern for health scams. I’ve had a few medical doctors who really cared and it showed. They listened and responded. They took the time. They didn’t have yachts to pay off, so weren’t pressured to make their office into an assembly line.

I’ve also had several doctors who clearly didn’t care. More and more, I got fed up with doctors who kept me waiting long after my appointed time, who then had nurses shuttle me into a small room to wait yet again, sometimes up to half an hour before the doctor showed up late for his appointment.

I remember reading about one patient who was billed for not showing up for his appointment. The patient sued the doctor for being perpetually late for his own appointments, and I seem to remember that the patient won.

In 1985, I was still in pretty good shape. Late that year, I decided to prepare for a 10K run to be held in Beverly Hills, sponsored by the bottled water giant, Perrier. I had never run this far before, so it was a bit of a challenge building up to that distance. Before the race, though, I had completed several 10K runs on a local high school track. My times were never that great, but for me that didn’t matter. Each was a new personal best.

When the date of the race came, it was a bright, sunny day. The air was unusually clear and crisp for Los Angeles. It was a glorious run—yet another personal best. That was early in December.

On December 31, while at work on the 9th floor of an office building in Hollywood, I started to feel strangely tired and my chest congested. I told my boss that I need to get some rest. I told him that I needed to fight off a flu or something. But it wasn’t a flu.

Symptoms persisted and morphed into new ones. For nearly 4 months, I fought to regain my health. I saw my doctor numerous times, and had many tests to find out what was going on. None of them were conclusive.

During those months, I found sleep restless. I could only lay down for 3–4 hours at a time. I could only work for 3–4 hours at any one sitting, and my boss was quite understanding. But this strange illness came with one equally strange side benefit. My mental clarity and creativity skyrocketed. I wrote a mountain of notes—creative thoughts, philosophical musings and realizations about life and the universe. Even now, rereading some of those notes touches me with a profound sense of awe. It was as if a window had opened up, allowing me to see things I could never see before.

I loved the mental benefit, but wanted to put the physical burden behind me. Finally, the doctor said that conventional medical wisdom had been exhausted, but she had an idea that might help. She recommended vitamin shots. I was no friend of the needle, but I was desperate to put this illness behind me.

I had no concern about a health scam. Clearly, my doctor had done everything she possibly could and went beyond the call of duty to give me a non-standard approach.

After the first set of shots (vitamin B and C), I felt a little better and gradually became more normal. A second set of shots in late April restored my prior health. To my surprise, most of the mental clarity stayed with me for several months, though the degree of creativity slowly waned. The vitamin shots had worked where all other medical procedures had failed.

A few years later, I again felt exhausted. Work had become extremely stressful and I had gone back to school, working toward a bachelor in computer science. I had not been getting much sleep. In fact, for the entire semester, I averaged 4–5 hours a night. But even after the semester was done, I continued to feel exhausted.

Some dear friends from Cambodia owned a bakery and coffee shop in the Valley in Los Angeles. The wife complained one day about feeling tired herself and suggested to me that we both go get vitamin shots. Though my tiredness did not seem to hold the same symptoms I’d had a decade earlier, I felt encouraged by the gradual improvement I’d experienced before. I had no fears that this was a health scam. Vitamins can be far more natural than the drugs used so often in health issues.

When we arrived at the doctor’s office in Thousand Oaks, I struggled to walk across the parking lot and painfully stood erect while the elevator took us both up to the second floor. I knew I could make it to the doctor’s office, but it seemed the longest walk I had ever taken. I felt as though my body was shutting down.

The doctor interviewed me and asked several questions about the symptoms I was experiencing. Then he approved me for the shot.

I asked what was in the shot and to this day, I cannot remember all the details. I know that it was a cocktail of several vitamins all in one fat syringe. It seemed like 10–15 cc’s of pinkish liquid. Several versions of vitamin B, plus C were in there, plus 2–3 other vitamins.

If I could’ve pegged my energy level on a scale, I’d have said that it sat at about 10% when I went in there. But even before the syringe had been emptied in my hip, I suddenly felt at 110% of normal energy level. I wanted to run around the block. It didn’t feel like a drug high or even a natural cortisone high. For the first time in weeks, I simply felt healthy again.

Health Scam—Bursitis

Bursitis of the elbow.

Bursitis of the elbow. Copyright Harrygouvas. Used with permission.

Several times in my life, I’ve had extreme pain in my right shoulder so that I couldn’t lift my arm. The first time this happened, my favorite doctor (the one who had given me vitamin shots the first time) had fallen ill and was no longer practicing medicine. I found a doctor who was a Russian immigrant who knew just what to do, though at first I suspected a health scam in the making. If I remember correctly, she gave me a shot of cortisone right into the joint. Instantly, it felt better. I was one happy camper, and any fears of health scam disappeared.

A couple of years later, I moved to Phoenix, Arizona. After moving all of the furniture into my new house, I experienced the same bursitis in my right shoulder. I went to several doctors and none of them helped at all. Each time, I told them about the Russian doctor in Los Angeles and the cortisone shot in the shoulder. Each one of them looked at me like I was insulting their intelligence, or that I was talking about little green men from Mars. I got the impression from them that the Russian immigrant had been a quack or a health scam artist.

One of my brothers who also lived in Phoenix, suggested that I see his chiropractor. I wondered what a spinal adjustment could do for my bursitis. Little did I know—everything! A pinched nerve in the spine at the base of the neck was the culprit that had caused the problem. Though the cure wasn’t instantaneous, the chiropractic treatments got at the root cause of the problem. I’ve had some conventional (allotropic) doctors roll their eyes at the mention of “chiropractic” medicine, but alternative forms of health care are not the health scam some traditional doctors would make them out to be.

A More Serious Health Scam

No health scam, here. Just a simple health exam.

No health scam, here. Just a simple health exam.

I had started to lose faith in the medical profession, as a whole. It seemed that excellence was more an artistic and social skill than in the science of medicine.

For the next doctor I visited, I went with a shopping list. I told him every little symptom I was having. I had a wart on my leg frozen. I told him how my many attempts in recent years to get into a regular exercise program frequently resulted in flu or cold-like symptoms. He only laughed at me and sent me off with a brown paper bag filled with anti-depressants. I never saw him again.

Later, I saw a doctor at the Scottsdale Mayo Clinic. I’d heard good things about Mayo, and was hopeful that they could help me improve my health. I figured in science, you work from details and observations. You can’t make a proper diagnosis without a clear picture of what’s actually going on. I spent more time on that doctor’s form than I had ever spent on any other. For my efforts, the doctor berated me. He told me that I had too many complaints on the form, and that I should limit myself to only 5 items per visit. Whoa! I didn’t know this guy, and he didn’t know me, but I didn’t like the idea of upsetting his cozy little life. He didn’t want to be bothered, so I never went back. So much for Mayo.

Several years later, I had a doctor on the West side of Phoenix and he seemed quite a bit friendlier and not nearly as much in a hurry to crank through the queue of patients. He wasn’t the best doctor I’d ever had, but he was at least approachable. I had been experiencing chronic acid and the doctor gave me a prescription that he said I’d be on for the rest of my life. A purple pill to subdue the acid beast. At last, I could lay down in bed again without coughing up liquid fire.

I had never had a full physical, before, but I thought since I was already in my mid 50s, now would be a good time to start.

My doctor recommended a good place at a local hospital and so I set up an appointment. When the day came, I was eager to take the test and find out the results. During the test, I was asked to walk a treadmill with electronic leads attached to my body. I became a little short of breath and felt my heart pumping vigorously. I wasn’t worried, but the doctor looked like someone had taken a shot at him with a loaded gun. He called my primary physician and berated him over the phone. “How could you miss this? This guy has a major heart artery that’s near completely blocked. He might die before he gets to the parking lot.”

Suddenly, two decades of physical difficulty came into sharp focus. Nearly a dozen doctors had missed a very important problem. Finally, I was going to get it fixed, even if only patching the symptom rather than the cause.

The operation was relatively simple. I was even awake during the procedure, watching on the monitor as he slid the stint into place to open up the blocked artery. Pretty slick procedure. I was in good spirits and even felt the dormant comedian in me come to life. Death didn’t scare me, but I did prefer life. I thought that if I could lighten the load of those around me with a little humor, it’d be a good way to go out, if that was my destiny.

Nearly ten years later, I wish I had looked for alternatives. The over-eager heart surgeon is looking more and more like a health scam to me. Modern medicine is great for emergencies, but lousy on health maintenance. In fact, if you study the entire industry critically and with a sharp mind for patterns, you’ll see that they’re only good at disease maintenance, not health maintenance. And that’s the biggest health scam.

A year after my stint was put in, I was having problems, again. The anti-cholesterol medicine I was taking was showing its ugly side effects. This was not long after some pharmaceutical giants were having their hands slapped for fraud concerning medicines which led to numerous deaths. I was concerned that the muscle weakness and pain I was starting to feel could cause more problems than the drug had solved. I researched alternatives and found plenty.

I stopped taking the medication and opted for relying on more natural methods. The older symptoms started to come back. Suddenly, I felt as though I was between the proverbial rock and a hard place. The medicine was killing me, but not taking it was also killing me. And now, I wasn’t in a trusting mood with conventional medicine.

Perhaps the most important alternative was diet. Changing from eating the “comfort foods” to something far healthier was not easy, at first, but I probably had it easier than most. I wasn’t nearly as attached to pizza and burgers as some Americans. I saw a nutritionist. I started taking all manner of supplements touted by some as “heart healthy.” I even ordered a special rice bran drink from an infomercial.

I also found a book on cures they (the medical establishment) didn’t want you to know about. Sure the guy wanted to make a buck, but he also revealed some very potent cures, too. My acid reflux was eliminated by apple cider vinegar. That tasted awful, so I opted for the alternative—papaya, digestive enzymes. Yum! That purple pill the doctor said I’d be on for the rest of my life was no longer needed. One more health scam bit the dust.

Thankfully, my health started to return. The poisons of the anti-cholesterol medicine started to leave my body and the problems caused by food and the chemicals in them were now less of a concern.

Something in what I had been doing, or perhaps a combination of elements, had cured me. It started to make me suspicious of the medical establishment who had helped to make it illegal for people to talk about “curing” anything.

Suddenly, I remembered the oddity of armed U.S. marshals arresting defenseless produce and raw milk at my local health food store in Los Angeles, two decades earlier. I had forgotten about that strange behavior by our government. Had U.S. Marshals been a party to another health scam? How long had our elected officials been in bed with corporations? All the talk I had filtered out before about lobbyists in Washington, DC, was starting to come back to me.

Then, it struck me that pharmaceutical companies have a vested interest in preventing cures. Think about that for a moment. Big Pharma corporate officers have a fiduciary duty to increase the bottom line—nothing more. In fact, cures are bad for business. Cure a cancer patient, and you no longer have those disease maintenance profits. When we’re talking about billions of dollars, that could be motive enough for murder. People have killed for far less. I felt as though I was uncovering a far larger health scam, something so pervasive that people would never notice it—like the air they breathe, or gravity.

Certainly, most of the people who work for pharmaceutical companies have high ideals about helping people who are in need. But those with more knowledge of the big picture are either turning a blind eye out of greed, or they are hiding a malicious streak that would make Hitler and his Gestapo thugs look like a Sunday picnic crowd.

A year ago, I did some research on prosperity versus cancer. Two world maps showed a striking correlation between high, per capita income and high rates of cancer. There were exceptions, but even those showed an interesting pattern. Those prosperous countries which had very low cancer rates we not consumers of Western food. Yes, not surprisingly, we’re being poisoned.

I even read some articles that said, contrary to all the medical hype about beef being a source of cancer, it’s really the hormones and other chemicals they pump into Western cows that cause the high cancer rates. Have we been sold an outrageous lie all these years? The health scam seemed to be getting deeper and deeper.

Then I read that it isn’t the sun’s rays that are cancer causing, but the petroleum-based sun-block that people put on their skin being cooked by the sun that causes cancer. Don’t believe it? Just ask yourself, how many people got cancer before Rockefeller started using his oil products in everything we eat, wear and medicate ourselves with? Very few. In fact, skin cancer is extremely rare in the sunny nations of the Sahara and Middle East. I wonder if the few who actually do get it are rich enough to afford imported sun tanning lotions with high SPF sun-block.

The Good, Bad and the Ugly—Bypassing the Health Scams

Escaping health scams. A soldier running in water in peak physical condition.

Soldier running in water. A picture of health.

Even the best medical doctors are likely clueless when it comes to real health. They’ve been educated at Rockefeller-funded schools or their clones and get all their health tips from Big Pharma salespeople. Normalcy bias keeps them from wandering too far from the drug-surgery paradigm of disease maintenance.

Life, liberty and the pursuit of health is a major part of what happiness is all about. Sure, we create our own emotions and can be happy even if we’re dying, but why not turn the tables on the greedy or ignorant medical doctors who really don’t know what they’re doing? Get healthy with non-GMO, naturally-grown fruits and vegetables with a little meat that hasn’t seen the chemical cocktails that most Western food producers use.

I think California voters were crazy to allow growers to keep from labeling their GMO foods. Not labeling is just plain dumb. And if you know more about GMO and its side effects, you know you’re only asking for more poison to eat that stuff.

Ultimately, you’re responsible for own your health. Exercise that responsibility.

Posted in Happiness, Health | Leave a comment